Woodward, Bob. Bush at War. Simon & Schuster. 2002. 355 pp.
Published just 14 months after the September 11th attacks, Bush at War by Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward covers the Bush administration on that infamous day and during the three-months following during which the Taliban was toppled in Afghanistan. This was one of the first books out covering the War on Terror, and certainly isn’t the best out there now; like most such works by journalists—as opposed to historians—it is long on the who, what, where, and when and very short on the why: don’t look for a lot of analysis in this book. Bush at War lacks a thesis, what it does is give an inside look at how top government officials, including the president, reacted to the attacks and how they planned and executed the war in Afghanistan. The epilogue covers about a year and the lead up to the Iraq war (which hadn’t been launched yet when the book went to press).
Seeing things that we all saw from the outside from the inside view that Woodward provides is very interesting. At just 9:44 am Bush told Cheney “We’re at war.” “That’s what we’re paid for boys,” he told his staff. “We’re going to take care of this. And when we find out who did this, they’re not going to like me as president. Somebody is going to pay.” (17) He used slightly cruder language with the Vice President: ”We’re going to find out who did this, and we’re going to kick their asses.” (18)
He wanted to be decisive and bold in his response to the attacks, not like the Clinton administration which limited it’s military response to terror attacks to air strikes. Bush said “I don’t want to put a million-dollar missile on a five-dollar tent.” (I’d elsewhere heard that quote expanded to “I’m not going to fire a million-dollar missile at a ten-dollar empty tent, and hit a camel in the butt.”) However, Bush told his communications director (Karen Hughes) to remove the phrase “this is not just an act of terrorism. This is an act of war,” from the Oval Office address he gave that evening. He wanted that speech to be reassuring, to be tough, and to show resolve, not to add to the country’s angst. A speech that he gave to the UN the next year went through 24 drafts (and they displayed the wrong one on the teleprompter).
Bush at War gives in sight into its eponym’s leadership philosophy and style. “I do not need to explain why I say things. That’s the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don’t feel like I owe anybody an explanation.” Elsewhere, Bush says
First of all, a president has got to be the calcium in the backbone. If I weaken, the whole team weakens. If I’m doubtful, I can assure you there will be a lot of doubt. If my confidence level in our ability declines, it will send ripples throughout the whole organization. I mean, it’s essential that we be confident and determined and united.
Woodward reports that, in interviews, Bush made frequent reference to his “instincts” or “instinctive” reaction, saying “I’m not a textbook player, I’m a gut player.” The author said that “[Bush's] instincts are almost his second religion.” These themes are demonstrated in much of what Bush does and says as recorded in the book.
Once the war gets going the book becomes much more interesting and faster-paced. The president et al quickly realized that the War on Terror would be a different sort of war, and scrambled to adjust to fighting a guerrila organization in Afghanistan and a terror network around the globe. During the 1991 Gulf War the military already had Operations Plan 90-1002 that they could dust off and follow. But there was no plan in place for the situation in Afghanistan. Much diplomatic wrangling with Pakistan and other countries for overflight and basing rights also had to take place. The need for bases for search and rescue teams held up the air war, due to unwillingness to risk pilots being captured by the Taliban.
Several anecdotes are interesting, including an offer they made to an Afghan tribal leader that he couldn’t refuse:
$50,000 was offered to a commander to defect. Let me think about it, the commander said. So the Special Forces A-team directed a J-DAM precision bomg right outside the commander’s headquarters. The next day they called the commander back. How about $40,000? He accepted. (299)
Then there is the account of how Dick and Lynne Cheney spent Halloween at an undisclosed location with their three grandchildren, ages 2, 3, and 7. The kids dressed up and went trick-or-treating in the bunker, knocking on the office doors of the staffers who were hiding out with them. And who knew that Dick Armitage, the Deputy Secretary of State, could bench 330 lbs. six times (Bush was only benching 205 lbs.).
The most colorful figure in the book is Cofer Black, the Director of the CIA Counter Terrorism Center, who, as Woodward says, “had a penchant for dramatizing.” He emphasized in early briefings that military action would be bloody, for both American and al Qaeda. ”When we’re through with them, they will have flies walking across their eyeballs.” (Other staffers subsequently referred to him as “the flies on the eyeballs guy.”) Later, in reference to al Qaeda, he said that “we’re going to kill them. We’re going to put their heads on sticks. We’re going to rock their world.” (103) But he didn’t want all of their heads put on sticks; he told a CIA team “You have one mission. Go find the al Qaeda and kill them. We’re going to eliminate them. Get bin Laden, find him. I want his head in a box.” Once said box was occupied by bin Laden’s head, he wanted “to take it down and show the president.” (141)
The information about Iraq—the invasion of which Paul Wolfowitz starting pushing on September 12th—is interesting, albeit incomplete, the book having been published before the invasion was launched. Cheney also pushed for toppling Saddam, which Powell opposed. Watching those dynamics play out in the epilog was informative, but much more research is needed on the lead up to the Iraq war—which hadn’t been launched as of press time—and historians will have their hands full with those events for decades as more information becomes available about what went right and wrong.
The book is okay, but is probably already dated as more scholarly books come out. And if you want analysis of the Afghanistan war, check out Imperial Hubris by Anonymous (a.k.a. Michael Scheuer). And if you want more details on the September 11th attacks themselves, see the 9/11 Commission Report (published July 2004). Still, Bush at War holds some interest for it’s view of the administration’s decision-making process after the attacks and during the war in Afghanistan.